| |
|
| | OrunXP | Jul 12, 2007 1:55am | Yeah the US is really pushing on it, could we loose our socialised healthcare? (amongst many other things?)
Canada would be the real loser in this system, but if it is imposed, corporations seem to have a lot to gain.. |
|
|
|  sollune | Jul 12, 2007 5:01am | | nothing can stop it except Québec Independence |
|
|
| | fredzena | Jul 12, 2007 9:46am | Thank you for bringing the vivelecanada site to my attention PassionatePuppy. I have added a link and the ribbon to the top of my pages and will keep it there. I hope more Canadian SU stumblers consider doing the same.
We must resist. Along with the concern about threats to our healthcare system (which I'm hoping Sicko and the 2008 presidential election will alleviate) how about the threat to being able to determine our own border-crossing, immigration and foreign policies. |
|
|
| | InsaneRamblings | Jul 12, 2007 9:54am | | I seriously don't see this getting through parliament with a minority government in place. |
|
|
Sponsor |  kapka | Jul 12, 2007 10:11am | 5. I agree but eventually it just might go through.
3. Québec independence is a dying issue... I don't mean too offend you personally with my comment. |
|
|
Sponsor | | ntltrmllgnc | Jul 12, 2007 10:16am | | Actually I have a plan from the US side. It involves poking a giant hole in the artificial authority structure of the US. |
|
|
| | sollune | Jul 12, 2007 11:00am | 5: the liberals serve the same interests as the conservatives. the NAU will pass, minority government or not.
6: no offense, really. deluded people have been saying that since, like, the 60s (if not the 1830s!)
7: great |
|
|
Sponsor | | ntltrmllgnc | Jul 12, 2007 11:04am | | The idea basically is that if the people desire a state must by proxy request power of authority from federal government. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Canada → Discussion